You’re completely right that this might be problem for older ladies. The 23 olds on Tinder don’t care what the guy says about who he is, they care about his looks and how he acts when he meets them year. The 37 12 months olds like Manta worry a whole lot about those actions, but that is the reason they ought ton’t be counting on just what males state about on their own on hookup apps like Tinder and Bumble to base their choice to possess intercourse using them. Then just slow down and do some diligence and vetting if they don’t want to assume the risk that he’s lying. Then find a different way to meet men if you don’t want to do that because you think the target will move on to the next girl. In any event, a draconian civil fraud regime is very unneeded. It truly is, into the truest feeling of the term, an approach to result in the act that is inherently risky of up safe for females (guys won’t be suing females for fraudulence because males evaluate mainly based on look).
All ladies who ride the carousel and marriage that is postpone the termination of their fertility screen have previously defrauded their future husbands (if any), also before trading vows. What’s the money worth of this?
As long as they a bit surpised whenever “what goes around, comes around”?
In addition to her proposed fines on males for “husband fraud”, real “equality” must also need fines for post-wall cyclists who saddle up a husband. Pay in cash in the altar. In addition to this, let’s reinstate the dowry system.
Yet again, “no consequences for women’s own bad behavior”.
Typical Leftist rationalizations from the WaPo and its own NPCs.