1) That the price of decay was constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances into the specimen dated haven’t been changed during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that after the stone first formed it included a known amount of child product (“Radioisotopes while the age of the earth” pg v)
We should observe that past processes may never be occurring after all today, and therefore some might have taken place at prices and intensities far distinctive from comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes plus the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)
Jesus cursed the bottom (the stones too!)
See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed may be the ground for the benefit”
If this took place there is a burst of radioactity that made the stones look more than they certainly were.
Would not this make all of the stones look the age that is same?
“The stone question is fairly https://datingranking.net/lumen-dating-review/ easy and has now regarding the elements that are basic constructed these stones at first. Whenever all these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it might simply be normal to allow them to act relating to their properties that are individual fundamentally acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various prices.